- EULA QUESTION INSTALLBUILDER HOW TO
- EULA QUESTION INSTALLBUILDER SOFTWARE
- EULA QUESTION INSTALLBUILDER CODE
EULA QUESTION INSTALLBUILDER HOW TO
I could *not* teach her how to use a Windows installer - its simply way too involved. After all, both are very straightforward tasks where you just click certain buttons in a certain program in a certain order. I’m certain I could teach her how to use Synaptic. Then they have to understand the installer itself. Before they ever start the installation, they have to be able to find the installer, download it, find it in their filesystem, and run it. The Windows installation method brings lots of different factors into play.
It is much easier for a newbie to understand a UI like Synaptic or KPackage, than to understand the quite complex procedure of running a Windows installer. Most people, at least here in the USA, are still on dialup.
EULA QUESTION INSTALLBUILDER CODE
Linux might not be as consistent as OS X, in a lot of ways, but without code reuse by shared libraries, it’d be way less consistent than it is now. They notice when things are more consistent because they all use the same libraries. Users notice when their apps are more stable because they all use the same well-tested libraries. Real users should love package managers, because they get lots of real benefits from them: Combine this with a way to easily add repositories to your configuration (perhaps with a special web link type like mailto:) and you can consider application installation/removal solved. It automates the procedure of generating.
EULA QUESTION INSTALLBUILDER SOFTWARE
Build Buddy solves that by making it extremely easy to package your software for multiple platforms. One of the few remaining problems with existing package managers (aside from GUIs that need to be simplified) is that the package you want isn’t always available for your distribution. Not to mention who much nicer things are when upgrades and dependency-tracking are done automagically. Intelligent package managers take the “Add/Remove Programs” concept to the next level, by letting you actually add programs as easily as removing them. God knows I’ll be happy if I never have to see another Motif installer again! Maybe Sun will take a hint and use this to make Java less of a bitch to install?īut going forward, I think something like Ximian’s Build Buddy is the best way to go. I really hope this is just a stop-gap solution for certain companies distributing binaries. Now, this one seems to be the only one that is really close to what BitRock does, but their site is not offering much info of its features and what not, so it is difficult to say if this can compete with Bitrock: This one sorts out dependancies, it is like a universal front end for DEBs or RPMs more than anything else, however it does have Bitrock’s characteristics.
This is close too, but it is not the same as Bitrock. So, these are out because of their java dependency: The best bet is to go with Motif or TCL/TK, but these days, GTK or Qt is maybe an even better bet. Not all distros have Java installed and not all users have it installed manually (remember that Bitrock’s targetting customers need to be able to get to as to many users as possible). Here is the lowdown from the ones that are actually distro-unspecific Installer builders (that means, they are not just for RPM or just for DEB files but they can build their own independant packages with or without dependancies).įrom that bunch, the following are out of the question because they are built in java. I took a look at your Freshmeat URL and checked out all the Installer Builder apps.
0 kommentar(er)
